All submitted manuscripts to JITCoS: Journal of Information Technology and Computer System undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure high standards of scholarly publication. The process is designed to be fair, transparent, and constructive.

Review Type:

JITCoS uses a double-blind review process, in which both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review. This helps ensure objective and unbiased feedback.

Review Steps:

1. Initial Screening: The Editor-in-Chief checks the manuscript for scope, formatting, and ethical compliance.
2. Reviewer Assignment: The manuscript is assigned to at least two qualified reviewers.
3. Peer Review: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, technical quality, clarity, and significance.
4. Decision Making: Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editor makes one of the following decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
5. Revision & Resubmission: Authors revise the manuscript accordingly and resubmit for further review or final decision.
6. Final Decision: The editorial team makes the final decision and prepares the manuscript for publication.

Review Timeline:

The review process typically takes 4 to 6 weeks. Authors will be notified promptly about each decision stage.

JITCoS: Journal of Information Technology and Computer System is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. The journal strictly adheres to ethical guidelines to ensure the integrity, quality, and transparency of academic publishing.

1. Responsibilities of Authors

• Submit only original, unpublished work that is not under review elsewhere.
• Ensure proper citation of all sources and avoid plagiarism.
• Disclose any conflicts of interest or funding sources.
• Provide accurate data and methodology, and retain data for verification if needed.
• Include all contributors who meet authorship criteria.

2. Responsibilities of Reviewers

• Review manuscripts objectively and confidentially.
• Provide clear, constructive, and timely feedback.
• Avoid personal criticism and maintain professionalism.
• Report any suspected plagiarism or ethical misconduct.
• Decline reviews where conflicts of interest exist.

3. Responsibilities of Editors

• Ensure fair and transparent peer review.
• Make publication decisions based on scholarly merit.
• Maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
• Investigate and address all allegations of ethical misconduct.
• Prevent conflicts of interest in editorial decisions.

4. Plagiarism and Misconduct Policy

All submitted manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection tools. Plagiarism in any form constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable. Manuscripts with evidence of plagiarism will be rejected or retracted.